The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a public censure against The Co-operative Bank plc for breaching its Listing Rules.
The Listing Rules require issuers to ensure that information published is not misleading so that investors can make fully informed decisions.
In a joint investigation with the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), the FCA also found that Co-op Bank fell short of its responsibility to be open with its regulators, which is one of the principles that regulated firms must abide by.
In addition to the joint investigation, the PRA has also separately published the result of its enforcement action against Co-op Bank. The PRA found that Co-op Bank failed to comply with Principle Three of the Principles for Businesses for the period 22 July 2009 to 31 December 2013. Principle Three requires a firm to manage its affairs responsibly, with adequate risk management. In particular, Co-op Bank had a three lines of defence risk management model that was flawed in design and operation.
Co-op Bank’s failings would normally merit a substantial fine. However, in the circumstances, the FCA has decided not to impose a financial penalty. The PRA has also, given the exceptional circumstances, issued Co-op Bank with a public censure.
As with all enforcement investigations, serious consideration is given to the impact of a financial penalty. In this case the FCA and the PRA considered the fact that Co-op Bank is engaged in a plan to ensure that it meets its Individual Capital Guidance on a sustainable basis and has adequate capital to withstand a severe stress.
Georgina Philippou, acting director of enforcement and market oversight, said: “Firms have a very basic but extremely important responsibility to be transparent with their investors and with us, as their regulator, and Co-op Bank fell short of this. As a result, investors were left unaware of Co-op Bank’s true capital position and we were left in the dark about intended changes to senior personnel at the bank.
“This is a serious matter, but exceptional circumstances mean a public censure is the appropriate and proportionate response. It is vitally important that Co-op Bank’s capital resources are directed towards improving its resilience.”
For the period 21 March 2013 to 17 June 2013 Co-op Bank breached the FCA’s Listing Rule 1.3.3R (misleading information not to be published).
In its financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2012, published on 21 March 2013, Co-op Bank stated that “Adequate capitalisation can be maintained at all times even under the most severe stress scenarios, including the revised FSA [Financial Services Authority] “anchor” stress scenario”. And: “A capital buffer above Individual Capital Guidance (ICG)* is being maintained, to provide the ability to absorb capital shocks and ensure sufficient surplus capital is available at all times to cover the Bank’s regulatory minimum requirements.”
In fact, since 15 January 2013, when the FSA had issued Co-op Bank with revised capital requirements, Co-op Bank did not have sufficient capital to meet its revised Capital Planning Buffer (CPB). This was the capital buffer set by the FSA “to provide the ability to absorb capital shocks and ensure sufficient surplus capital is available at all times to cover the Bank’s regulatory minimum requirements.” In addition, when the financial statements were published, there was no reasonable basis for stating that Co-op Bank had adequate capital in the most severe stress scenarios.
Co-op Bank also breached Principle 11, which requires firms to be open and co-operative with regulators, and disclose information of which the regulators might reasonably expect to be aware. Co-op Bank failed to notify the FCA or PRA of intended changes to two senior positions and the reasons behind those changes in the period April 2012 to May 2013.
Investigations into senior individuals at Co-op Bank during the relevant period are on-going.
